Report Bug
Susam Pal wrote:
Hello! This is a comments page for reporting bugs, typos and other errors found anywhere on this website. If something looks broken, confusing or incorrect, please click the 'Post Comment' link at the top to report the issue. When reporting an issue, please include a link to the page where you found the issue.
Ikiatl wrote:
Loved your Langford Pairing blog post. Found a small error in the proof of sufficiency. I think the value of \( c \) should be \( 4x - 1 \) and not \( 4x - 3 . \) Great blog post though!
Presh wrote:
Wonderful Langford Pairing post. By the way, I believe there is a small typo in the formula for \( c. \) It should be \( c = 4x - 1. \)
Susam Pal wrote:
Thank you, Ikiatl and Presh, for your comments. The formula for \( c \) indeed had a typo. Although I wrote the correct values for \( c \) obtained from the formula \( c = 4x - 1 \) in the examples, the formula itself was written incorrectly as \( c = 4x - 3. \) I have corrected Langford Pairing to use \( c = 4x - 1 \) now.